The Da Vinci Code
Started by lingolas on Nov 26, 2004 · 11 posts in thread
lingolas (#1)
kinda old now, but check out the Davinci Code
Laurana (#2)
already read it... a year ago. 
_Droroet_ (#3)
Been meaning to get around to it. Hopefully I will soon.
Trianna (#4)
read it 
Awesome book!
Awesome book!
Dunadan (#5)
Good book, though some things wrong historically (i'm picky about history, most was right though).
(i'm picky about history, most was right though).
weems (#6)
Thats why it's called historical FICTIONDunadan wrote:Good book, though some things wrong historically
Dunadan (#7)
Thats why i didn't say it was nonfiction?
weems (#8)
well, the whole POINT of historical fiction is to take something that really happened, and write a fake story about, while changing things to fit your story. if it WAS completly accurate, it wouldnt be historical fiction anymore.
i dont even know why im defending the book. i didnt even LIKE the book.
i dont even know why im defending the book. i didnt even LIKE the book.
Dunadan (#9)
I'm not saying it has to be completely accurate, i said its a good book, what pisses me off is when people take it like a history book and start quoting "facts" from it. It's when people are ignorant that it is fiction that makes me mad .
.
Trianna (#10)
Lol, i think it's funny how you end the sentence about how your mad with a smiley face :p hehehe
Dunadan (#11)
Lol yeah, cause i rarely get mad, and its a habit to do .
.
