Search found 552 matches
- Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:19 pm
- Forum: Tests and Trials
- Topic: Player vs Player topic and issue
- Replies: 11
- Views: 16755
- Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:51 pm
- Forum: Tests and Trials
- Topic: Player vs Player topic and issue
- Replies: 11
- Views: 16755
- Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:02 am
- Forum: Tests and Trials
- Topic: Player vs Player topic and issue
- Replies: 11
- Views: 16755
- Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:06 pm
- Forum: Writing and Building
- Topic: Builders
- Replies: 24
- Views: 27056
- Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:36 am
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Ridicule Suggestions!! (To Help avoid Abusing the Command!)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3886
- Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:00 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: A new spell: Break Enchantment
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6793
- Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:58 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: A new spell: Break Enchantment
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6793
Just to play the devil's advocate, but they can already do that with jewelry. My take: Allow it, but when it is done, 100% of the item's enchant space will cost glory 1:1 like a mob item. That way it can be done, but not to raise your enchant, and it is rather expensive, so a last ditch for expensiv...
- Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:26 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: A new spell: Break Enchantment
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6793
Last time I checked, putting spells into jewelry maxed out their enchantment, not emptied it. The exact opposite of what he's asking about.Kiasyn wrote:Code: Select all
conjure cantrip enchant ring cantrip c 'break enchantment' ring conjure cantrip enchant ring cantrip
Maybe it has changed.
- Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:35 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Did you know?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 21643
- Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:20 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Caretakers Ratings according to me
- Replies: 31
- Views: 19421
- Wed Jun 07, 2006 8:55 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Citizen's Arrest...
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5027
You just have to realize something... the imm's are imm's. They arent caretakers like how they were meant to be but have instead turned into the same ones that were at forbidden-realms... actually I think they might be worse in some aspects. You cant argue with an imm. well you can but expect to be...
- Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:42 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: NARUTO
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5340
- Sat May 27, 2006 9:27 pm
- Forum: Tests and Trials
- Topic: Spells you think don't work properly...
- Replies: 31
- Views: 37643
- Wed May 17, 2006 11:45 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Forum bots
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8686
- Sat May 06, 2006 7:10 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Player Feedback
- Replies: 22
- Views: 15414
I am not happy with how DL's administration has been operating lately. The immortals have been more focussed on punishing bad behavior than they have been on encouraging good behavior and promoting fun, which is certainly a bad indicator. Thats my big complaint. I do not feel as if it should be the ...
- Sun Apr 23, 2006 2:17 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: gallery
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7094
- Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:42 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Creationism vs evolutionism
- Replies: 118
- Views: 67350
External looks mean jack-s*** when it comes to healthiness... I should also point out 'attractiveness' is relative/subjective. You think primitive man gave a rat's rear about hygiene and bikini waxes? Looks DO NOT mean jack. We rely on looks and attractiveness when choosing a mate for a reason, it ...
- Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:11 am
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Creationism vs evolutionism
- Replies: 118
- Views: 67350
- Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:56 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Creationism vs evolutionism
- Replies: 118
- Views: 67350
Weems, It was not the lack of natural selection pressure that implies de-evolution, but the actions we replaced them with. Our culture has selection pressures that will promote evolution, but not in a manner that is in the best interest of the race. I used the term devolution to show that it was no...
- Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:42 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Creationism vs evolutionism
- Replies: 118
- Views: 67350
Re: Devolution
Sorry about my last post being so short, I had to go help my wife. You all know I seldom make statements without backing them up. So to fill in the details, here is the rest of the story. Lingolas, I am glad you caught that myth about us using only 10% of or brain. I used that specifc example becau...
- Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:19 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Did you know?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 21643
- Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:45 pm
- Forum: Tech Zone
- Topic: Clients codes or scripts
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7356
- Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:44 pm
- Forum: Entertainment
- Topic: Playstaion 3
- Replies: 30
- Views: 36301
- Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:32 am
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Creationism vs evolutionism
- Replies: 118
- Views: 67350
- Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:20 pm
- Forum: General Chatter
- Topic: Creationism vs evolutionism
- Replies: 118
- Views: 67350